I have often been asked if I believe that I have made an impact since returning to Council – the simple answer is yes.  Since returning to Council June 2023 I have attended 13 general council meetings during which time I have submitted 10 notices of motions  and 32 amendments to Administrative reports or other Councillors NOM’s.

Have they all been successful, no but it’s important to have open discussion and different perspectives. This goes to the heart of transparency so that the community knows that issues are being challenged and attempts are being made to get a better result.

Of the 32 amendments I have put forward I am proud of the following:

I attempted to reduce residential rates by 10% – lost

• To have the administration negotiate a fair price for fixtures and fittings owned by the Vale ladies – won. The Vale Ladies received a payment of $10,000 which they donated to palliative care.
• For the Council to write to NSW Fire Commissioner about the treatment of volunteers in the communications brigade and the lack of public consultation with respect to disbanding the brigade. – won
• To have the report on the loss of grant funding for Main Street referred to the Asset, Risk and Improvement Committee for independent review – won.
• Moved to have the use of section 226(d) of the local government act referred to Asset, Risk and Improvement Committee for independent guidance in relation to the current Mayor approving 2.2 million dollars prior to entering caretaker mode – lost
• Moved to have no change in rural rates until a proper policy is debated by the elected Councillors and the community is engaged in meaningful discussion.

Of the Notices of Motion that I submitted I would like to highlight the following:

• Rates Review – to lock at the impact of rates on both business and residences -lost. I was impressed by the Administration’s response to my report – 2 pages for every page I wrote. Although this motion went down working with community saw rates for Marrangaroo Fields revert to rural residential.

• Governance review of fees and charges. To have fees and charges reviewed by the finance committee. Fees and charges go up every year but no business cases are very tabled – lost.

• Community meeting at Tarana – I worked with the community to meet with Councillors and management to discuss roads. – won.
• Lithgow Hospital – that the Administration seek clarification on staffing levels at Lithgow Hospital – won

• Bathurst Bullet – that the Administration write to the Transport Minister objecting to extending the Bathurst Bullet to Orange at this point in time. This would have had disastrous impact on our community with no increased carriages.

The post Media Release – What Have I Achieved Since Returning to Council appeared first on Councillor Steve Ring.

At our last Council meeting I was disgusted at attempts to yet again silence Cr Stephen Lesslie because he was giving an opinion.  It doesn’t matter if anyone agrees with him – as an elected representative of our community he is entitled to express that opinion.

I called a Point of Order on the Mayor and Councillor McGhie because Cr Lesslie had not breached either the Code of Conduct or Code of Meeting Practice, nor was the matter Operational. I told the Councillors to grow a pair and get over it – Councillors are entitled to an opinion and to express it and if you don’t agree with it that’s life.

However, later in the meeting I ensured that Councillor McGhie was able to amend a motion consistent with the Code of Meeting Practice and even provided him with the words for the amendment. Why? Because the outcome was the best for the community moving forward.

Councillors working together, does not preclude heated debate nor should it be based on friendship, party or team allegiance.

I believe that I have demonstrated during the past twelve months to support any issue that I believe is in the best interest of our community regardless of the author of the issue.

If I or any of my team are elected, we are committed to working with all Councillors for the benefit of our community.

The post Media Release – Councillors Told To Grow A Pair appeared first on Councillor Steve Ring.

Apologies for not posting about the July meeting but here are the key elements of our last meeting.

Mayoral Minute – Halloween 2024

The return of Halloween to main street was a decision of Council. I amended the Mayoral minute so that the additional funding is drawn from carryover revenue from the SRV for economic transition. Why? Halloween has always been staged as an economic stimulus package and drawing on these funds is appropriate. If it is just a dress up party then clearly the funds would have to come from another source but that is decision for the community and council moving forward.
I also added an additional point requesting adequate surveys and assessment of the event be undertaken and reported back to the next council. The Mayor and Councillor McGhie voted against the amendment. The only Councillor to vote against the motion was Cr Lesslie.

Notice of Motion – 26/08/2024 – Cr S McGhie – Police Check and working with Children Check for Councillors

All candidates for Council elections are required to nominate and sign a statutory declaration see below. Candidates must acknowledge that they are not excluded from standing for Council as per the exclusions under the local government act.

Any sitting Councillor or candidate who believes a candidate for this election is not fit to hold public office needs to refer their proof and concerns to the electoral commission. If substantiated those individuals will be prosecuted for signing a false declaration and excluded from Council.

Any other action is a cheap political stunt to sew doubt in the minds of all residents. As stated at the Council meeting, I have a volunteer WWCC check but I won’t be posting it online. Why? Because you as an individual are unable to verify the currency or validity of the number provided unless you meet specific requirements as outlined at the following link.

The Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW) [WWC Act]- states that these checks are required for anyone who works or volunteers in child-related work in NSW.

Child-related work is defined by section 6(1)(a) of the WWC Act as involving direct contact by the worker with a child or children and that contact is part of or more than incidental to the work. What are child related positions can be found at https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-2012-051#sec.6

Response to Notice of Motion – 22 July 2024 – Rural Waste Management
I was dissatisfied with the response to my original Notice of Motion, so I successfully moved the following to replace the Administration’s response. This is how Councillors hold the Administration to account. Our rural residents deserve answers to their legitimate concerns. My motion was supported unanimously.
Motion

1. That Administration provide a report to the next Council meeting addressing the following:
a) Design guidelines for all waste transfer stations to ensure that residents can safely dispose of their waste at the transfer station inclusive of a risk assessment for unloading rubbish
b) Table the review undertaken by the Administration bulky waste services referenced on p 8 of 48
c) Option to provide enhance resource recovery options for residents in rural areas at Waste transfer stations

Continuation of the Wolgan Road Reconstruction – Interim budget allocation

The Administration had the mayor authorise the expenditure of $2.2 million because of the proximity to the Caretaker mode, an online extraordinary could be called very quickly. It wasn’t so I moved the additional Point

That Item 3.9 is referred to the ARIC Committee for review and advice to the next Council on developing an effective policy on Section 226 (d) of the Local Government Act

Not I thought an unreasonable request, but it was voted down by Councillors Statham, Bryce, McGhie, O’Connor and Goodwin. No council I have reviewed has a financial delegation greater than $500,00 for the mayor and only for specific uses. Why is Lithgow different and why would these councillors not wish to have protection for future Mayors?

Main Street CBD Stage 2 Footpath Revitalization Program – Funding Advocacy

$1.93 million dollars lost through poor management. I raised this publicly on the Friday before the Council meeting as part of the past on governance. Another candidate’s team after reading it, posted the next day sensationalizing it and using it to attack sitting Councillors. The loss of these funds raises serious question about Council operations which will be answered through the additional point that I added, and which got up:

C) That Item 3.11 is referred to the ARIC Committee to review the management of this project and to report back to the next Council.

The Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee will review this project and report back to the next Council. This is an independent committee regulated by the state government with access to all Council records. It achieves what Councillor Lesslie wanted but without going to the State Government.

Councillors employ only one staff member and our roles are regulated by state government legislation which you can read at The role of Council, Councillors and the General Manager .

The post Summary of Council Meeting 26 August appeared first on Councillor Steve Ring.

• Why is your group running for council and What are some of your group’s goals if elected?

In June 2023 I returned to Council after the resignation of former Councillor Deanna Goodsell.

I believe that I have made my presence felt in the chamber where I am content to play devil’s advocate and question everything that is tabled. It is the role of an elected Councillor to hold the Administration and when needed other Councillors to account.

I vote according to my conscience, research and what I believe to be in the best interest of our community.

I have selected a team that I believe is a good cross section of our community and we are committed to holding both Councillors and the Administration to account. It’s our money, our community and you vote for the councillors not the Administration.

“Gowing our community” is not a throwaway line but a firm commitment to get back to basics – roads, water, sewerage and waste. These are the building blocks of our community and once dealt with we can build a new future for our children and grandchildren.

You can find out more about Team Ring at independentlithgow.org  

• How would your group improve Lithgow’s economic future?

 Between February 2022 and February 2024, I was the volunteer Project Director for the Bushfire Local Economic Relief Fund for the Lithgow District Chamber of Commerce. During this period, I oversaw the delivery of a procurement forum for local businesses; Reintroduction of local Business Awards; A Business and Lifestyle Expo that attracted over 3,00 visitor and a targeted Investor Forum which attracted participants form the US, Finland, Denmark and form around Australia.

Team Ring is committed to diversifying our economy, attracting new residents, and ensuring that no one is left behind. If elected, we will:

Ensure that there is greater transparency and communication with the community and key stakeholders in growing our economy

Prioritise the development of Greenspots Industrial Park and associated housing estate.

Ensure The Foundations are supported in the development of the former cement works.

Seek to commit Council resources to attracting industry to invest in Lithgow – following on from the Lithgow Investor Forum. Targeting new technologies such as green hydrogen production, commercial glass houses (vegetable and flowers), recycling and manufacturing,

Explore opportunities to develop intensive agriculture within the Greater Lithgow Region.

Seek to undertake a review of tourism within the Lithgow LGA and determine what actions are required to grow commercial tourism over the next 10 years.

• Does your group have a plan to address the region’s housing needs? If so, what is the plan? 

In the last 12 months across Australia 2,400 construction firms have failed due to the current economy. Add to this the rising cost and shortage of building materials will impact on local construction.

 Council needs to process DAs for houses in a timely fashion, but we also need to have a bigger discussion about tiny homes and relocatable homes. There are many large blocks in Lithgow and the other villages where the buildings could be placed (like a granny flat) allowing residents to generate some revenue while increasing housing stock.

My team will seek to have this discussion within the context of developing a flexible housing strategy is developed that can meet not only projected growth but also unexpected demand via new industries

In that discussion will be the need for adequate social and affordable housing options for our community.

Council is already looking at how it can increase social housing through entering partnerships or direct sales to not for profit housing organisations. This is currently occurring at the Three Tree Hill subdivision (Council owned) where an EOI has been forwarded to numerous companies and the next Council will make decisions going forward.

Council has capacity to sell some of these blocks directly to locals via a lottery system like that used by Bathurst Council.

Council can also negotiate with developers for the inclusion of social housing through the DA process.

• How do your group intend to address local infrastructure issues such as roads, sewerage and water? 

The reality is that there is no quick fix to our local infrastructure. Council manages a large number of assets including 1,110 kilometres of roads. Council has still not fully implemented or completed its asset maintenance system This system is critical for our community to understand the current condition of our assets and how much money is required to maintain them and replace them in the future. Without this information financial planning is not accurate and this is reflected in the recent rate rise.

Calculated into the rate rise was a need for an additional $500,000 for roads but not based on an understanding of the real needs. How did they come to this figure? Simply there were two years where road budgets were overexpanded by $500,00 therefore moving forward, we need that amount of money. This was not the right approach.

We will address the question of infrastructure by:

A firm commitment from the Administration to complete all asset management plans for roads within 12 months.

The development of a 10-year replacement schedule for roads based on priority.

Seek to have a four-year maintenance plan for dirt roads in the LGA inclusive of cleaning drains

The adoption of a new policy for the management of back flow in the most affected residences.

Seek a cost impact assessment of providing limited bulky waste collection in areas that are not service by kerbside collection.

Seek to ensure regular testing of water at selected residential and commercial premises with the results made publicly available. With the result to be continuous improvement of the service.

The post Media Release Lithgow Mercury appeared first on Councillor Steve Ring.

The General Manager is the only employee that the elected Councillors appoint and manage. At no time during the six years that I have served on Council, no training has been offered to Councillors in work planning or performance management review. This is why I moved the additional point below:

That training in performance management be undertaken by the General Manager Performance Review Panel prior to their first meeting.

Carried

Lake Lyell – Correction of Historical Land Anomalies

This item dealt with the transfer of lands that started over 11 years ago to Energy Australia and relates to former roads submerged under Lake Lyall. This completes an old agreement where roads that Energy Australia owned were transferred to Council including a large portion of barton Ave in Wallerawang.

Carried:

For: Councillor M Statham, Councillor E Mahony, Councillor A Bryce, Councillor D Goodwin, Councillor S McGhie, Councillor C O’Connor and Councillor S Ring

Against: Councillor S Lesslie and Councillor C Coleman

Lake Lyell Lease – Proposed Excise of Lot 2 in DP792415 and Related Matters

This item related primarily to handing back part of the land leased from Energy Australia if he pumped hydro project goes ahead.

Ordinary Council meeting

At this meeting my primary concern related to the timing of the return of the lease which previously had been an immediate transfer. On that basis I supported the original motion as put.

For: Councillor M Statham, Councillor D Goodwin, Councillor S McGhie, Councillor C O’Connor and Councillor S Ring

Against: Councillor C Coleman, Councillor A Bryce, Councillor S Lesslie and Councillor E Mahony

Extraordinary Council meeting

A recission motion affords Councillors an opportunity to revisit an item and it is remiss of Councillors not to take the opportunity to review the original debate and to do additional research. This is exactly what I did.

I reviewed both the Environment Protection Act and Regulations. The landowner can submit a DA without a lessee’s consent.

I attended as President of the Lithgow District Chamber of Commerce 2 Energy Australia Benefit Sharing workshops.

I spoke to a variety of residents for, against and indifferent to the proposal.

I watched the debate several times.

Reviewed the legal implications of changing the project to Critical State Infrastructure.

What I concluded was that Councillor Lesslie was correct we need to secure a financial benefit because of the project – not just relinquishing a lease. I would also like to note that EA have legal avenues where they could cancel the lease. I do not believe that is likely to happen. The financial benefit should be consistent with the principles of benefit sharing or voluntary planning agreement.

With respect to the retention of the workers camp and use by Council moving forward more discussion is needed. A lot of questions need to be asked and resolved before making an informed decision.

For the reasons stated I chose to vote for the recission motion and not support the original motion. This does not mean I support or oppose the project – I will wait until all the information is on the table as I have previously stated.

The rescission motion was carried

For: Councillor M Statham, Councillor C Coleman, Councillor A Bryce, Councillor S Lesslie, Councillor E Mahony and Councillor S Ring

Against: Councillor D Goodwin, Councillor S McGhie, Councillor C O’Connor

NOM – Cr Mahony – – Reporting of Proceedings of Bushfire Management Committees Meeting to Council

This motion was primarily focused on Regional Fire meetings, attendance by Councillors and staff, and the sharing of minutes. I raised concerns over the treatment of volunteers specifically those in Lithgow’s Communication Brigade and successfully added the additional point.

That Council write to the NSW Rural Fire Services Commissioner seeking clarification with respect to the Chifley Area Command allegedly forcing the relocation of the Lithgow Communications Brigade to Bathurst amid threats of disbanding the unit if they refuse and what level of community consultation has occurred.

Carried

Making of Annual Rates and Charges 2024/2025

I successfully added an additional point:

That no changes to the Farmland Category occur during the 2024/25 financial year and that a full report on proposed changes including the consultation process is brought back to Council.

The amendment was carried out and became the motion.

A letter was sent to rural residents advising many that they were not deemed to be rural farms but rather rural residential. The amendment stopped this – rural production is a complex issue and needs to be dealt with properly.

Carried

Delivery Program 2022-2026 and Operational Plan 2024-2025

The Council Administration advertised additional positions for the LEEP program which are to be funded by the rate rise. I tried to stop this happening but was not successful. The Administration jumped the gun by advertising before the funding sources and positions were approved by the Council. In my opinion this is not good enough.

Local Government Remuneration Tribunal Determination 2024

I did not support this increase, nor did I support he reason Councillor Goodwin gave for moving the increase. At my first meeting on returning to Council I stated that this council lacks consumer confidence – this pay rise does nothing o alleviate that. The proposal to increase the level of remuneration should have been taken to the community as an election issue.

Carried:

For: Councillor M Statham, Councillor C Coleman, Councillor A Bryce, Councillor D Goodwin, Councillor S Lesslie, Councillor S McGhie and Councillor C O’Connor

Against: Councillor E Mahony and Councillor S Ring

The video clip below highlights what’s wrong with this Council -a lack of understanding of the role for the General manager and proper procedure

The post Summary of Council Meeting 24 June and Extraordinary Council Meeting 8 July 2024 appeared first on Councillor Steve Ring.

Notice of Motion – Cr Ring – Tarana Roads – Community Meeting

I am happy that Councillors supported my recommendation for a public meeting with Tarana residents to discuss current condition and ongoing management of roads in their area.

Our rural residents often feel let down by Council and not part of the broader community, this meeting will allow the resident to voce their concerns and to be heard.

Resolved: Unanimous

Tender 05/24 – Blast Furnace Projection Lighting and Electrical Upgrades

$430,000 in grant funds allocated for lighting upgrades to the Blast Furnace Park. The successful tenderer was Frontier assembly Pty Ltd,

Resolved: Unanimous

Beatlesfest Event Assistance Application

$20,000 allocated in sponsorship for Beatlesfest 2024/125 form the large events budget. Our new Director is proposing significant changes to how we manage our limited event budget and I agree with his view that events need two – three years to develop.

At the meeting it was noted that the event ran at a loss last year – but that loss was won by the organisers not Council. I reiterated my disappointment that Councillors were not briefed on the results of last year’s event, but this was not a reflection of the organisers. This was a failure of the mayor and General Manager to organize after I had previously raised this matter at an earlier council meeting.(see video below)

Resolved:

FOR: Councillor M Statham, Councillor D Goodwin, Councillor S McGhie, Councillor E Mahony, Councillor C O’Connor and Councillor S Ring

AGAINST: Councillor C Coleman and Councillor S Lesslie

South Bowenfels Housing Initiative Project

Councils Three Tree Hill Development at South Bowenfels is now deemed development ready. In order to minimise the risk to Council in developing the land and to ensure an appropriate financial return for Council an Expression of Interest will be called to determine the level of interests from suitable proponents to partner with Council or purchase with land.

The results of the Expressions of Interest will be presented to the next Council to make a determination on how to proceed. As I stated at the meeting, it is my position that when the land is sold is through a ballot system for Lithgow LGA residents

Resolved: Unanimous

2023/24 Quarter Three Budget Review

The report is available online if anyone wishes to read it. My o0ngoing concern id the lateness of deferring capital works projects to then next financial year. Council needs to have a better understanding of its capacity to implement capital and should be deferring projects at the March Council meeting not in June.

This is an ongoing issue and concern of mine with respect to Council waiting until the 11th hour to rephase capital works programs. Council should be able to determine what projects need to be deferred much earlier in the financial year.

Resolved: Unanimous

Proposed Transfer of Land at Blackmans Flat to EnergyAustralia (NSW) Pty Ltd for Pipeline

The sale of Lot 1 in DP1127043 ( the block can be viewed at https://maps.six.nsw.gov.au/) to energy Australia. This is a former road that eventually may have provided access to Council owned land Blackmans Flat earmarked for a future waste facility. Conditions of sale would ensure future access to the site. It should be noted more that half of the lot is under a dam. Market price will be obtained.

Resolved: Unanimous

Various Matters – Lake Lyell Lease from EnergyAustralia (NSW) Pty Ltd .

An overly complicated report design with several separate issues was deferred to an Information Session.

Resolved: Unanimous

Outcomes of Study Visit LA TROBE VALLEY

Any visit to la Trobe to assess their Transition process should have occurred during the or prior to the preparation of the Lithgow Local Economy Project. I called this visit a junket and I stand by that claim

The post Summary of Council Meeting 27 May 2024 appeared first on Councillor Steve Ring.

9.3. Notice of Motion – Cr S Ring – Bathurst Bullet

I successfully moved the following:

THAT the Council write to the Honourable Jo Haylen Minister for Transport that Lithgow Council does not support the proposed extension of the Bathurst Bullet to Orange and that development of Lithgow as the terminus for both the electrified city line and for an enhanced central west service be advocated.

The use of the Bathurst bullet as an intercity train between Orange and Lithgow makes sense particularly if Lithgow rather than Mt Victoria becomes the terminus for all Sydney Electric Trains. It would result in benefits for the entire Central West. Just adding Orange to the existing service would impact on Lithgow residents. I will continue to seek better rail services for our community.

FOR: Councillor M Statham, Councillor C Coleman, Councillor S McGhie, Councillor E Mahony

and Councillor S Ring

AGAINST: Councillor A Bryce, Councillor D Goodwin, Councillor S Lesslie and Councillor C O’Connor

10.1.1. – Request for Fee Reduction – Use of Tony Luchetti Sportsground – Lithgow Workies Wolves

This was a very long debate – all because I wanted to add the following words to the final point: and the Finance Committee. It was eventually resolved, and the wording was added to ensure consistency with a prior resolution referenced in the Administrations report.

At the meeting I stated that this reflect the failure of the administration to assess the capacity of our community to pay. Community groups should not have to come back annually seeking reductions form Council. We should know what both the cost are and the capacity to pay.

Supported Unanimously

10.2.3. Draft Lithgow Local Infrastructure Contributions Plan (Section 7.12) 2024

I didn’t support this the first time it came to Council due to the lack of support for first home buyers.

I still have concerns about the impact of this policy on first home buyers and I will continue to pursue opportunities for Council to provide relief to low-income earners and first home buyers moving forward.

I am also concerned about the Lithgow Centric nature of the works proposed but as the plan is only for 12 months, I supported it. The next Council can review this document and make any necessary modifications that are needed.

10.4.2. Delivery Program 2022-2026 and Operational Plan 2024-2025

The Sounds of Silence could have been the theme song for council when this item was read out. Cr Bryce moved it but didn’t really talk to it. I seconded the motion to ensure it weas place on public exhibition and I had a lot of comments to make. My commentary on the evening was as follows:

Tonight, we are being asked to approve the Draft operation Plan and Fees and Charges for the public to have their say.

Following the two information sessions I have reviewed all documents and submitted a series of questions some of which I am still waiting for a response.

I will provide the Administration additional time in responding to my concerns before determining if I will support the documentation before us at the June meeting or whether or not I will move amendments.

I will however make some preliminary commentary:

Fees and Charges

I am not concerned with what other Councils charge; I am concerned about what it actually cost Council to provide services and if the fees and charges are fair and equitable and that capacity to pay has been properly assessed.

The questions that I sent to the Administration were not all about increase but also decreased fees.

At the Information Sessions I was not satisfied with the responses concerning how “capacity to pay” is determined and the apparent lack of costings that could be tabled for review. If we do not know what the cost for providing service/goods such as water are to our consumers, but we still annually increase prices.

Increasing or decreasing fees and charges need to reflect the cost of providing the services and a better understanding of how we assess capacity to pay.

Proposed Changes to Rating Structures

It is still my contention that a Fair and equitable distribution of the rate burden was not achieved with implementation of the SRV. Nor was due consideration given where the application of the SRV led to extreme outcomes in the amount of rates paid.

When I raised the issue of a rate review in February there were several Councillors who supported various aspects of that NOM. What concerns me is that we push LEEP but our business rates are such that they are a disincentive to do business.

All Councillors are aware of the long-standing dispute between Council and Mr. Greg Johnston. We were given assurances that this would be dealt with by the GM in December last year. Mr Johnson has made numerous representations and offers to resolve this matter but still after 9 months we are receiving emails in relation to this matter.

The rates for Mr. Johnson Caravan Park increased from $8,000 to $16,000 and yes we can blame land values. But no report has been provided to Councillors showing that this business has the capacity to pay or the adverse impacts this will have on our tourism industry and the provision of low socio-economic housing at the park. At an increased cost of $154 per week it is a very expensive cup of coffee. This matter needs resolution

The Administration have accepted that Marrangaroo isn’t part of Lithgow and will lower their ad valoreum but that will result in increased rates for Lithgow residents.

That’s interesting given the approach to the Special Parking Rate Levy

This levy ceased being used for its approved purpose a long time ago but the manner with which Council has used these funds was for general revenue. When a special rate levy has served it purpose it is legally required to cease operation.

I’m glad we are getting rid of it but the Administration want to retain the revenue by passing it on to all rate payers why not just pass it on to the residents of Lithgow – it’s the Lithgow City that benefitted from this levy.

Better still why not spread the love for both the Special Parking levy and the reduction in Marrangaroo rates across all rate payers. I fail to see why this isn’t occurring.

11.5. LATE REPORT – Operations Committee Meeting Minutes 16 April 2024

Discussion on this item became heated in the meeting held on 16 April specifically in relation to the reflux valves where debate was stifled by the Chair. The video clip below from the Council Meeting highlights the lingering frustration from this meeting. The issue of reflux valves ahs not gone away.

Cr Ring, Lesslie and Mahoney left the meeting of the 16 April during the discussion about the previous Mayoral minute of replicating the prison signs for the entrance to our towns. The Mayor was not happy with dissenting views and the Chair would not uphold any points of order. As such the item was not resolved

12. Business of Great Urgency

You need not worry that the Operations Committee did not resolve the issue of signage because it was moved as an item of great urgency by the Deputy Mayor Cr Goodwin. I did not support this because the Administration have not allowed for the design work in the current draft budget, and something will have to be cut.

At the Operations Committee the Administration had obtained quotes for printed aluminium sleeves at a fraction of the cost (similar to what the sighs originally looked like) allowing more time to discuss and investigate the best options for new signage.

The post Summary of Council Meeting 22 April 2024 appeared first on Councillor Steve Ring.

I have nil problem with facilities being named after residents. However, due process must be followed in order to be transparent in our decision-making process and that is why I moved the following amendment:

That the proposal to name the Kremer Park Grandstand to the “Gary (Snag) Taylor Grandstand be placed on public exhibition and in the event of no objections that the Grandstand is named after “Gary (Snag) Taylor”

The Amendment was carried and for the record I will not be providing the names of those who objected to the Mayoral minute to the General Manager as requested by the Mayor,

9.2 Mayoral Minute – Town Entry Signage across the LGA

The motion brough forward by the Mayor was:

THAT Council bring forward $100,000 from the 2024/25 Operational Plan to fund the design and construction of new town entry signs through Lithgow, Wallerawang and Portland.

After debate Cr Colemon moved the following amendment which I seconded:

THAT the Town Entry Signage across the LGA be deferred and brought to the next Operations Committee meeting for discussion.

The amendment became the motion and was carried. Is the replacement of these sign our most urgent priority with respect to asset management? Given that we have engaged professionals to prepare a Destination Marketing Plan and the rebranding of the Lithgow LGA for Tourism – its appropriate that we wait for the branding to be completed prior to expending funds on signs.

10.1. Councillor S McGhie – 25/03/2024 – Rebate scheme for the fitting of reflux valves

A third point was added to the original motion proposed by Cr McGhie which was subsequently carried:

THAT

1. $150,000 be set aside to fund the private fitting of reflux valves to the first 200 successful applicants.

2. The administration set up a simple system for application, approval, inspection and payment of a maximum $750 rebate per household.

3. The refined and finalised process for rebates and the process such as eligibility be brought to the next Operations Committee meeting for discussion and finalisation the Council.

This motion was carried only because it will be discussed further in the operations committee which could lead to further debate of change.

Residents pay to have sewerage removed from their property and not to receive the delivery of sewerage. This is an ongoing problem for many people through no fault of their own and an issue that has been ignored by countless Councils and Administrations.

It is still my opinion that residents should not be out of pocket for these works and that a rebate of $750 is grossly inadequate but we are now at least openly discussing the issue.

11.3.1- Proposed Study Visit – Latrobe Valley

As I said at the meeting – “A junket by any other name is still a junket and this proposal serves no real purpose for the community that we represent. I cannot support what is in my opinion a complete waste of rate payer money.”

Established in 2016 The Latrobe Valley Authority represent the changing needs of six councils and is an ongoing project. There is ample information available on the Authority and its success and failures available online so is there any real benefit in going. For me the answer is no because several online (zoom) meetings could be organised at nil cost and achieve the same outcome.

And I am still not sure why the General Manger who is retiring on the 30 June needs to go.

The proposal was successful:

FOR: Councillor M Statham, Councillor A Bryce, Councillor D Goodwin, Councillor S McGhie and Councillor C O’Connor

AGAINST: Councillor C Coleman, Councillor S Lesslie, Councillor E Mahony and Councillor S

Ring

Councillor O’Connor supported the motion, but we will not be undertaking the two-day junket.

It was, however, very nice of the Mayor to thank those Councillors who were not attending the junket for saving the ratepayers money. See the vidoem below

11.4.1. Destination Action Plan

After many years Council has finally contracted a highly regarded firm to prepare a Destination Management Plan for our community. The plan will go on public exhibition soon and I would encourage everyone in the tourism industry to review it and make comments as necessary.

The draft plan recommends revisiting the branding of Lithgow – it may or may not result in the retention of the Seven Valleys. I will be interested in both community and tourism operator feedback.

The post Summary of Council Meeting 25 March 2024 appeared first on Councillor Steve Ring.

Since returning to Council last June and voting against the rate rise, I have been approached by residents concerned over the adverse impact of the rate rise on their individual properties inclusive of farms, residences, and business.

The notice of motion I submitted was based on considerable research in an attempt to ensure that the rate burden is applied in a fair and equitable manner.

An amendment was put by Cr Goodwin after asking the General Manager to give a verbal summary of the lengthy administration’s commentary on my motion. Which was nearly 2 pages of commentary for every page I wrote.

The amendment that was put forward by Cr Goodwin was:

THAT the Council maintain its current focus on continuous improvement and refinement of the rating system, acknowledging that the Council will soon receive advice from the administration, and they will, at that stage, determine any required changes for the year ahead and beyond.

A division was not called and the motion was carried – but not unanimously! The administrations comment made it clear that the staff do not want to add additional subcategories.

It is the Councillors who are elected by the residents and who are responsible for making the decisions. This matter will not go away.

10.2.4. – Sewer Management and Response to NOM

The report tabled provided no immediate relief to our residents who must endure raw sewerage flowing back into their houses during major storm event. Lithgow is not a third world country and our resident deserve better. Probably 30 to 100 residences urgently require the introduction of a reflux valves immediately which would stop the flow of raw sewerage into their houses during major storm events. This measure would then allow the long term works to upgrade the systems to proceed.

The motion was lost:

FOR: Councillor C Coleman, Councillor S McGhie, Councillor E Mahony and Councillor S Ring

AGAINST: Councillor M Statham, Councillor A Bryce, Councillor D Goodwin, Councillor S Lesslie and Councillor C O’Connor

Apparently living in third world conditions is acceptable

The post Summary of Council Meeting 26 February 2024   appeared first on Councillor Steve Ring.

Another long meeting but it allows you to judge the elected Councillor based on their actions and performance.

Councillor S Ring – 30/01/2024 – Governance Review of Fees and Charges

It is imperative that Councillors via the Finance Committee take a more proactive approach to reviewing new and increased fees and charges. There have been fees and charges introduced I believe are neither fair nor appropriates such as additional Fees for Administration applied to Food Premises Under the NSW Food Regulation 2015.

My motion was put and lost:

For Clr Ring, Mahoney, Coleman, Lesslie

Against: Clr Statham. Goodwin, Bryce, O’Conner, McGhie

Councillor S Ring – 30/01/2024 – Modification of Financial Delegation.

I sought to ensure greater transparency in the expenditure of the $1.09 million dollars in transition funds that have been generated because of the special rate variation. This would have required Councillors determining contract for consultants over $25,000.

My motion was put and lost:

For Clr. Ring, Mahoney, Coleman, Lesslie

Against: Clr Statham. Goodwin, Bryce, O’Conner, McGhie

Community Submissions regarding Council’s Draft Operational Plan 2024/2025

In addition to Clr Colemans motion to extend the date for submissions from the public – I added an additional recommendation to change the Community Engagement and Communication Policy iso that no items are exhibited over the Christmas period when Council is Closed and key personnel on leave.

The motion was put and won:

For Clr. Ring, Mahoney, Coleman, Lesslie, Bryce, O’Conner, McGhie

Against: Clr Statham. Goodwin,

Councillor E Mahony – 30/01/2024 – Sewer Management – Installation of Sewer reflux valves

Lithgow is not a third world country – however we expect some of our residents to accept raw sewerage entering their properties. The adopted resolution will see Council prepare costing on the introduction of reflux valves to affected properties.

This item will not be off the agenda as I am concerned until the problems are rectified.

The motion was put and carried unanimously/

Councillor E Mahony – 30/01/2024 – Council representation at the Lithgow Bushfire Management Committee

Bushfire management is a key issue for our community and reaffirming our support for the volunteers and ensuring that there are Councillors at each meeting is critical. I also added a point to Clr Mahoney’s recommendation requesting that reports on all meetings with the RFS are brought back to the Council meetings.

The motion was put and carried unanimously.

– Replacement of Second Grader

Staff having equipment to undertake the work that we as a community want is critical. However, the funds for the purchase are from the special rate variation item “Improving the Way we manage our assets. Which has two programs $396K for General Asset Maintenance Program and $517K General Asset Renewal Program (which was to increase the Playground renewals budget by 75%)

The purchase of the grader was brought forward because of the underspend of this years srv funds.

I questioned the impact on future playground works and was told there would be none. While ever I am on Council, I will continue to monitor the outcome of these two programmes.

The motion was put and carried unanimously.

Policy 9.20 Conflict of Interest

I successfully had this item deferred to an Information Session. Why? Because the advice of

ICAC it isn’t relevant for Councillors and the guidelines were written for staff. Do why include Councillors?

The motion was put and carried unanimously.

Contracts entered into during Christmas Shutdown – Donkey Steps and Browns

Gap Road Maintenance

This item was not just about undertaking critical works but the use of Clause 226(d) of the Local Government Act outlines that the role of the mayor includes “to exercise, in cases of necessity, the policy-making functions of the governing body of the council between meetings of the council, Mayoral function.

The mayor approved $1,401,717 ex gst for these works during the Christmas recess. I have found no example of a Council where a mayor has a delegated authority to incur expenditure in excess of $500,000 (for specific issues). The mayor has not beached the Act but a Mayoral delegation needs to be developed and adopted ASAP

The ambiguities in this section of the Act have been identified by the Office of Local Government and will be added to the next Legislative review.

The motion was put and carried unanimously.

Community Development Committee Minutes – 12 December 2023

The summary by the Administration fails dramatically to highlight for the community and councillors the loss of Approximately $21,000 for the most recent Opera Event and the fact that the April 2022 Event Lost about $7,000 page 8 of 11.

Matters of Urgent Business

Clr McGhie moved to bar Clr Lesslie from 3 Operations Committee meetings. This was a code of conduct issue that should have not been dealt with in either urgent business or open council

The motion was put and lost Watch the video clip if you don’t have 4 hours to spare

For: Clr McGhie Clr Statham.

Against: Clr. Ring, Mahoney, Coleman, Bryce, O’Conner, Goodwin,

The post Summary of Council Meeting 30 January 2024 appeared first on Councillor Steve Ring.